Kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400. UltraMax 400: Underestimated

Kodak Ultramax 400 Film Profile

kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400

I got this in Tokyo too with my Nikon F3. In any event, you shouldn't be able to see grain unless you print above 10x8 or so or. The greens are really on point, true color, vivid, but not distracting. However, because you don't like Disneychrome Velvia , I'd suggest you try 1 of each at home first and see what you like best. I hope someday you expand in your cameras as you seem to be in your film search.

Nächster

Kodak Ultramax 400 vs Fuji Superia 400 film : AnalogCommunity

kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400

I am on the big step to move to color photography using film. In shooting UltraMax, overexposure results in color shifts where as Portra tends to maintain colors and highlights when it is overexposed. The cheap films I tend to use are Kodak Ultramax and Fuji Superia, both in 400 and 800, mostly because they are the most available. For me its the great natural tones I love, no crazy oversaturated colours that digital photos tend to display. We can feel the amateur target all around the package with the stockphoto family pictures and the uses for the film, however, I love the vintage feeling of Kodak canisters with just the plain Kodak yellow.

Nächster

UltraMax 400: Underestimated

kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400

And while may fall a bit short of Shakespearian mastery, it comes pretty close. Seeing these difference and similarities is critical when you begin shooting film as it will help you to narrow down on your favorites, specific benefits of each film, and key negative aspects of certain films that you may not want in your photos. Except for the grain, I really like the color for portraits. A subreddit for lovers of analog photography. Particularly with warm light, blues are really true to color. It offers fine grain, deep saturation, and wide exposure latitude, and all of these traits make it well-suited to enlarging, and for digitization through scanning. Its color rendition is true to life, less punchy and saturated than.

Nächster

What's your preferred consumer grade film?

kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400

Also, Superia 400 is made in 120 size, the 200 isn't. I think I'll stick with Kodak for my current project, for consistencies sake. It has reasonable saturation and contrast. When using it for street photography, reds completely pop. Superia 200 was a good film, but, you can't get it locally anymore. When in doubt, we went half a stop over box speed. It means deliberately underexposing it e.

Nächster

Fuji superia Kodak Ultramax

kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400

I found the same problem before with great film for landscapes, but definitely not the best for portraits. But then again it's all about the lenses, eh. Ektar has great color performance, but for Asians, their skin color would be too satuated. Why Superia Premium is my favourite film a nd how is it different from X t ra 400? Always paired with a 28mm or a 50mm. I meant the date of expiration, not of production Fuji is a behemoth company and I suspect they are earning much more on their Instax stuff rather than on 35 mm films.

Nächster

Kodak Portra 400 vs. Fujifilm Superia 400? Not really..

kodak ultramax 400 vs fuji superia 400

Kodak just gets kind of grainy. The Ayes Have It Is Kodak Ultramax as capable of making the stunning and vivid landscapes we see from and? In overexposing UltraMax, I notice the image tends to lean warmer in evenly lit images. I believe this film packs one heck of a punch. I really enjoyed shooting this film. But at the same time, the pavement has a reddish hue. Follow Blog via Email Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Nächster